1. what is the author’s main argument? what are they trying to argue? 2. what are/ is the authors’ primary source/s? do they use them effectively to actually argue their case? 3. Against whom or what particular viewpoint is the article attempting to argue? 4.what are/ is the authors’ secondary sources? Does the author use them well? 5. in your opinion, what areas might have been addressed or fixed to make more sense 6. what is the conclusion of the article? Do you agree with it? why or why not?